OBAMA’S GODFATHER: CHAPTER 3: SHOCK DOCTRINE FOR DUMMIES
Sunday, November 8, 2009
ditor’s note:
This chapter gives the reader a structured analysis in detail combining several technical and tactical methods used time and time again by Soros and his consorts to achieve not only domination over world economies but supreme domination over countries and their inhabitants
CHAPTER 3: SHOCK DOCTRINE FOR DUMMIES
In the Hindu trinity there is the god Brahma who is the Creator, the god Vishnu who is the Preserver and the god Rudra who is the destroyer of worlds. Like Rudra, George Soros is The Destroyer of Worlds.
When the Soviet Union collapsed under a mountain of debt in the late 1980s, uncertainty ensued. A scholar named Francis Fukuyama published a book called “The End of History”. That book argued that ideological conflict was passé and the future belonged to markets. That argument seemed naïve to me, given what we had witnessed in Iran at the beginning of that decade. Nevertheless, the book was important for an entirely different reason, which I failed to appreciate at the time: fundamentally, it was a call to arms for the economic elites in the western world to abandon the old east-west paradigm and move aggressively toward a global economic model, which offered global capitalists lower costs of production and vast new markets which could be linked through supply chain strategies.
More recently, author Naomi Klein wrote a revealing book called “Shock Doctrine”. This book describes in detail the principal vehicle used by the elites to impose the global model on targeted countries: “The first step is to create or exploit a crisis to advance an agenda which could not survive the democratic process in normal times”. .(Note: that is what Obama’s Chief of Staff Rham Emanuel meant when he said: “Never let a good crisis go to waste”). “The second step is to establish a new government in which multi-national corporations and political elites serve their own interests at the expense of the public.” (Note: the paradigmatic example of this is Chicago, and the Daley machine that gave us Obama. This is well documented by the Chicago Tribune’s fine investigative reporter John Kass.)
Soros is no stranger to shock doctrine methods. He introduced them first in Poland. He forged a relationship with the Solidarity Movement and helped them bring down the communist government. He brought in his cronies for the ostensible purpose of moving the country from communism to a free market economy. Fundamentally, this meant a transition from state ownership to private ownership of large segments of the economy. To those with money it was a “buying opportunity”. Thus, Soros and his cronies purchased former state enterprises debt free and acquired resources at bargain basement prices. Many people lost their jobs as a result of this privatization. Soros was indifferent to their fate. He admits that he knew that his shock therapy would cause huge unemployment, closing of factories and social unrest. To him it did not matter.
He introduced shock therapy again in Russia. The result was chaos and hyperinflation. The Yeltsin government imposed draconian cuts in state spending to industry and agriculture while the economy was still state owned. A goal of zero budget deficits in three months was announced. Credit to industry ended, businesses piled up debts and inflation went out of control. Meanwhile Soros associates moved in with hard currency and cornered the market on cheaply priced resources like aluminum and oil. These predations by Soros caused great suffering in Russia, and ill will toward the United States. (Note: this is why Putin turns a cold shoulder to his man Obama. Also, it helps explain why Russia has turned to China and forged an economic alliance adverse to our interests, apart from geopolitical and economic factors). ” (See “The Secret Financial Network Behind “Wizard” George Soros”)
http://www.questionsquestions.net/docs04/engdahl-soros.html Finally, Soros was an active participant in the efforts of British and American intelligence organizations to topple communist regimes in Yugoslavia (The Colors Revolution), Georgia (The Rose Revolution) and Ukraine (The Orange Revolution). Again, the mantra was to bring the fruits of democracy and the free market economy to former Soviet vassal states. Once again shock doctrine methods were deployed and they brought instability, violence and economic despair. The Russian Mafia filled the vacuum–Don Symon– Capo di tutti capi. (Note: the CIA uses the color revolution term to designate a Soros-directed revolution.) (See Russo-Georgian Conflict Originates With Soros Subversion) http://www.rense.com/general83/soros.htm When it was over, Soros told journalist Michael Lewis: “The Soviet Empire is now known as the Soros Empire.” http://www.undueinfluence.com/open_society_institute.html
The last three cases are instructive for our purposes because new methods were used to topple those regimes and install governments who would play ball with Soros. Those methods were based on the tactics of Professor Gene Sharp, Chicago radical Saul Alinsky, and Italian communist Antonio Gramsci (The Prison Diaries).
The common elements were as follows:
I) a charismatic leader,
II) a cult movement,
III) the conspicuous use of young people,
IV) a three word message,
V) mind numbing chants,
VI) symbols of change,
VII) flash mobs,
VIII) media support, and
IX) the entry of Soros agents into the new regime.
(N.B. these methods have been given the euphemistic name “The Velvet Revolution”—or bloodless revolution. Soros would use them later in the Obama presidential campaign.)
(Note: No discussion of the Soros role in shock doctrine policy would be complete without some mention of Zbignew Brzezinski. Brzezinski was National Security Advisor under Carter, was active in the liberation of his native Poland, and actively promoted Islamic Fundamentalism in the Asian Republics to bring down Soviet Union. Now of course we are living with the consequences of his policies. Today, he is a Professor at Johns Hopkins, and was an active supporter of Obama during the campaign. However, Dennis Ross tells us that Brzezinski is not an advisor to the Administration. I accept that as true, based on the respect I have for Ross, Brzezinski’s known hostility toward Israel and the adverse impact his presence would have on the peace process.)
Could Brzezinski exert indirect influence with Obama through the Soros portal? I think the answer is yes. The reason I say that is because Brzezinski is now predicting that Obama will fail if he does not keep his promises to the Muslim World. That same message could be communicated through Soros at the point of decision. What we can say for sure is this: Soros and Brzezinski are personal friends, served together on the Council of Foreign Relations and had a common interest in the destruction of the Soviet Union. Brzezinski is not only a practitioner of shock doctrine, but an eager architect of it and a perfect soul mate for Soros.
0 comments:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)